Natural Science has offered following theories of life origin:
- Abiogenesis (life spontaneously come into being from non living matter – through selfreplicating properties of matter-minerals).
- Extraterrestrial such as Panspermia (life seeds are all over in Universe) or Exogenesis (life is somehow transferred from Mars or other places in Universe). And of course, there are little green beings out option.
Still, science is aware of such spontanous improbabilities and here it comes with popular theory of Multiple Universes. That of course means , our universe is lucky one, praised in cosmic lottery with Life came into being.
Also new thing on the block is Intelligent design ID (same facts science has to support evolution, ID uses to prove acts from Inteligent creator, clues of ID in natural world). ID is old 20-30 years. Few years ago came into mainstream. But major science community is against such theory, claims is the same as Creationism (where Bible creation is taken literary).
Why is that so opposed views in life origin?How something complex as life, came by spontaneous processes?
We obviously don’t belive messages like “John loves Mary” written in sand, aren’t product of waves and sand. To remind anyone, all life forms are also written with letters (Darwin didn’t knows that) 3 billions of them in DNK code-language.
Why some simple messages are not product of a intelligent being, but some very complex are? (if we, of course, suppose John is intelligent being).